Category Archives: Resources

James Cameron to be Inducted as Fellow of College of Labour and Employment Lawyers

In November 2022, James Cameron will be inducted as a Fellow of the College of Labour and Employment Lawyers.

The College was founded in the United States. It is an organization that promotes achievement, advancement and excellence in the practice of labour and employment law, as well as working to establish leadership, high standards of professionalism, and civility among labour and employment lawyers. The College has fellows in the United States and Canada.

James will be joining Sean McGee, who was inducted as a Fellow of the College in November 2020.

Dayna Steinfeld Joins LEAF Winnipeg Executive

Dayna Steinfeld has recently joined the Executive of the newly established LEAF Winnipeg as Co-Chair and Strategic Initiatives Coordinator.

LEAF Winnipeg is a branch of LEAF, a national feminist organization that works towards ensuring the law guarantees substantive equality for all women, girls, trans, and non-binary people through litigation, law reform and public education using the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. LEAF focuses on litigation and law reform and public legal education to work to achieve substantive equality, and in its work as a branch, LEAF Winnipeg will actively advance these areas of LEAF’s work.

As Strategic Initiatives Coordinator, Dayna will work to organize and advance initiatives and advocacy in areas of importance to the local branch and to support the efforts of LEAF at a national level.

Shopify Terminations – Our Employment Lawyers are Here to Help

Did Shopify terminate your employment? We have a dedicated team of Employment Lawyers ready to help. Severance packages can be confusing, which is why we’re committed to answering all of your questions and helping you through this uncertain time. Schedule an appointment today with one of our experienced Employment Lawyers to review your termination package and make sure you get a fair deal. You can come meet with us in person, by videoconference or by phone.

Amarkai Laryea Joins RavenLaw!

Amarkai Laryea Joins RavenLaw!
We are ecstatic to welcome Amarkai Laryea into the partnership at RavenLaw! Amarkai has dedicated his career to working within Canada’s labour movement. He will maintain a dynamic, fully-bilingual practice in all areas of labour, human rights, and administrative law.
Before joining RavenLaw, Amarkai was a leader in the legal services department of one of Canada’s largest unions. He has appeared before labour arbitrators and administrative tribunals throughout the country. More recently, Amarkai was the lead of a new initiative focused on increasing access to justice at a federal tribunal.
A graduate of McGill Law, Amarkai is a member of the Canadian Association of Labour Lawyers (CALL) and the Canadian Association of Black Lawyers (CABL). He also dedicates time to mentoring students and is involved in various social justice initiatives.
Please join us in welcoming Amarkai to our Ottawa office!

Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench Rules that Manitoba Government Discriminated Against First Nations Children in the Child Welfare System

Scales of Justice

On May 18, 2022, the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench ruled that the Manitoba government discriminated against First Nations children in Manitoba foster care by denying them the federal Children Special Allowance (“CSA”) to which they are entitled and which is meant to be used exclusively for the care, maintenance, advancement and education of children in care. 

In Manitoba, approximately 82% of children in the child welfare system are First Nations. From January 1, 2005 through March 31, 2019, Manitoba required Child and Family Service Agencies to remit all CSA benefits received for children in their care. When Agencies refused, the CSA amounts were clawed back from their Operational and Child Maintenance budgets.  In total, Manitoba recovered over $334 million during this period that would otherwise have directly benefited children in care.

In 2020, Manitoba passed legislation (section 231 of The Budget Implementation and Tax Statues Amendments Act, or “BITSA”), which attempted to retroactively authorize its taking of CSA funds. This legislation also sought to absolve Manitoba of all liability for doing so, including by preventing any lawsuits – including already filed and ongoing lawsuits – against Manitoba over its taking of CSA funds.

In 2021, the Assembly of Manitoba chiefs initiated an application against the Manitoba government over its attempt to legislatively prevent children in care from seeking recourse for the denial of the CSA funds. 

The Court’s decision found that the Manitoba government discriminated against children in care by taking the CSA funds from them, and that its attempt to absolve itself of liability for the holding back of over $334 million from children and youth in care was unlawful and constitutionally invalid. The Court found that Section 231 of BITSA “overwhelmingly impacts the Indigenous children and disabled children in care. The CSA policy prevented the claimant group from receiving equal benefit of the law resulting in economic and social consequences to Indigenous children in care The Court stated that “over 150 years of colonial policies which removed children from their families and nations is one example of the historical discrimination against [First Nations] children.” It acknowledged the significant disadvantages experienced by Indigenous children in care, which were perpetuated and exacerbated by Manitoba’s treatment of CSA funds.

The Court found that Manitoba discriminated against First Nations children on the basis of race, ethnic origin, disability, and family status contrary to section 15 of the Charter. In particular, the Court’s finding of discrimination on the basis of family status is notable and precedent-setting as the family status of a child in care had not previously been recognized by courts as a basis for grounding a claim of discrimination. This recognizes, as AMC argued before the Court, that the targeted discrimination of First Nations children in care by Manitoba could not be fully understood and remedied without recognizing family status as a ground of discrimination.

The Court concluded that it [was] a violation of s. 15(1) [of the Charter] by Manitoba to preclude children in care from receiving the CSA Benefits and then enacting s. 231 of BITSA to make the CSA Policy law in Manitoba.” The Court declared section 231 of BITSA to be invalid and of no force or effect. The Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs was represented by Byron Williams and Chris Klassen of the Public Interest Law Centre of Legal Aid Manitoba, with the support of many other lawyers and students at PILC, and Dayna Steinfeld of RavenLaw, with assistance from Anna Rotman.